VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TABOR MANOR CARE CENTER

TABOR MANOR CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TABOR MANOR CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TABOR   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have TABOR
State attribute explanation IA   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have IA
Street 209 MAIN STREET  
Zip Code 51653  
Phone 7126292645  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
67  (41.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
52  (39.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/27/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
52  (39.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.31  (0.46 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05  (0.54 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/13/2011
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/29/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 10/13/2011
date Of Correction: 11/13/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 10/13/2011
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/26/2012
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/13/2011
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/13/2011
date Of Correction: 11/13/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/29/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 22.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.8 % (28.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5 % (14.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 % (6.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6 % (2.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.4 % (2.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.6 % (10.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.7 % (11.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.3 % (0.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19 % (6.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5 % (18.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9 % (12.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (5.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7 % (15.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.6 % (0.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1 % (21.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5 % (0.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.8 % (5.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3 % (15.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved