TARPON POINT NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Sarasota	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Sarasota
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	5157 PARK CLUB DRIVE
Zip Code	34235
Phone	9413770022
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	111 (19.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (111)
Percent of Occupied Beds	93 % (9.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (93) %
Health Survey Date	2/17/2012
Fire Survey Date	2/15/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	None	vs	3.9% Nursing Homes USA have None
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	9

Staff Information
Number of Residents	111 (19.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.45 (0.32 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.94 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.39 (0.2 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (5.44 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 09/27/2011 date Of Correction: 10/27/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 04/06/2010 date Of Correction: 05/06/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/15/2012 date Of Correction: 06/15/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/15/2012 date Of Correction: 06/15/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 09/27/2011 date Of Correction: 10/27/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/17/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 05/15/2012 date Of Correction: 06/15/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/15/2012 date Of Correction: 06/15/2012

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 07/17/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.5 % (0.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.6 % (4.94 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	48.6 % (4.06 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.7 % (11.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11.5 % (1.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.9 % (1.88 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.7 % (13.06 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (16.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1 % (14.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.6 (79.9) % (1.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.4 % (4.3 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.3 % (2.92 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.7 % (0.2 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	48.1 % (4.72 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.3 % (38.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	28.3 % (3.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.8 % (16.36 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	99.6 % (24.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13.9 / 15.3 %