Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| TAUNTON NURSING HOME | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
95 (3.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.08 (0.31 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
| Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.46 (0.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
| Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.55 (0.04 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
| Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.02 (5.47 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
| Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.02 (0.08 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/13/2011 date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/02/2011 date Of Correction: 05/04/2011 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/21/2011 date Of Correction: 06/13/2011 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/06/2009 date Of Correction: 10/08/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/06/2009 date Of Correction: 10/08/2009 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
39 % (13.91 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
9.3 % (7.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
3.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
2.5 % (9.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
6.8 % (8.83 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
22.9 % (9.44 % higher than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
3.6 % (24.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
5.9 % (37.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
20 % (5.02 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
90.7 % (6.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
90.7 % (6.76 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.2 % (14.32 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
39.5 % (14.11 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.4 % (22.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
7.4 % (6.7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
4 % (5.22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5.5 % (3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
53.5 % (10.12 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.1 % (7.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
11.1 % (1.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
1.2 % (18.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 5.6:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
22.9 % (1.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
82.6 % (1.16 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
83.5 % (8.75 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||