VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TERRACE AT SOLARBRON THE

TERRACE AT SOLARBRON THE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TERRACE AT SOLARBRON THE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City EVANSVILLE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have EVANSVILLE
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1701 MCDOWELL RD  
Zip Code 47712  
Phone 8129850055  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
39  (69.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
28  (63.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
72 % (11.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/29/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/6/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare  vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
33  (58.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/29/2010
date Of Correction: 08/27/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 02/21/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 02/21/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/23/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/29/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/23/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
50.6 % (25.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 % (13.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8 % (6.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.3 % (11.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 % (1.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (7.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (15.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
57.2 % (32.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3 % (15.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.6 % (24.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved