VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TERRACE OF DAYTONA BEACH, LLC

TERRACE OF DAYTONA BEACH, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TERRACE OF DAYTONA BEACH, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DAYTONA BEACH   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have DAYTONA BEACH
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 1704 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE CIRCLE  
Zip Code 32114  
Phone 3862556571  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
108  (0.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
107  (15.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
99 % (15.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/23/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/23/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 10/26/2011
date Of Correction: 11/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/26/2011
date Of Correction: 11/21/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 07/20/2011
date Of Correction: 08/20/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 10/26/2011
date Of Correction: 11/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 06/24/2010
date Of Correction: 07/24/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.1 % (5.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (31.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1 % (9.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.5 % (6.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.5 % (7.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.2 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16 % (2.54 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 15.9:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.2 % (16.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.7 % (7.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (14.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.4 (90.3) % (7.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.6 % (9.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.3 % (0.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37 % (6.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 % (4.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
17 % (21.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.1 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.3 % (34.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.5 % (0.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 % (14.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved