VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > THE AMBASSADOR OMAHA

THE AMBASSADOR OMAHA

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
THE AMBASSADOR OMAHA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OMAHA   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have OMAHA
State attribute explanation NE   vs 1.4% Nursing Homes USA have NE
Street 1540 NORTH 72ND STREET  
Zip Code 68114  
Phone 4023936500  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
136  (27.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
87  (4.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
64 % (19.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/23/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
87  (4.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
(1.23 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
3.6  (2.76 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day 5.6:1  
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (5.38 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/30/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/23/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/30/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.2 % (19.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.9 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5 % (3.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7 % (26.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
44.4 % (0.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.7 % (9.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.4 % (7.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
65.8 % (18.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4 % (44.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.4 % (22.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 % (20.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2 % (3.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 % (4.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.6 % (8.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9 % (1.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
38 % (0.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.6 % (9.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.9 % (6.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
60.9 % (13.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.2-20 % (6.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved