VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > THE CEDARS OF CHAPEL HILL

THE CEDARS OF CHAPEL HILL

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
THE CEDARS OF CHAPEL HILL VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Chapel Hill  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have Chapel Hill
State attribute explanation NC   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have NC
Street 101 GREEN CEDAR LANE  
Zip Code 27517  
Phone 9192597000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
12  (96.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
(85.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
50 % (33.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/13/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/13/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare  vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
(85.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.6 % (21.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.7 % (12.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved