VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > THE DALLAS CENTER OF REHABILITATION LLC

THE DALLAS CENTER OF REHABILITATION LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
THE DALLAS CENTER OF REHABILITATION LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City DALLAS   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have DALLAS
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 4200 LIVE OAK ST  
Zip Code 75204  
Phone 2148210050  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
136  (27.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
88  (3.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
65 % (18.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/19/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
88  (3.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2  (0.36 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.94  (0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (5.27 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/07/2010
date Of Correction: 01/20/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/04/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/04/2011
date Of Correction: 04/15/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/19/2011
date Of Correction: 06/16/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/28/2009
date Of Correction: 11/03/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: 11/03/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.2 % (8.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7 % (10.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (11.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.3 % (0.84 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6 % (22.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.3 % (7.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
39.5 % (45.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
44.2 % (39.74 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6 % (44.3 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2 % (8.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.8 % (7.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.6 % (1.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.8 % (9.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.1 % (4.52 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9 % (15.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.3 % (9.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.6 % (40.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
54.6 % (20.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved