VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > THE VILLAGE OF REDFORD, A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY

THE VILLAGE OF REDFORD, A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
THE VILLAGE OF REDFORD, A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City REDFORD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have REDFORD
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 25330 WEST SIX MILE ROAD  
Zip Code 48240  
Phone 3135316874  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
88  (20.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
77  (14.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/13/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
79  (12.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/28/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.9 % (22.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.4 % (0.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
20 % (6.54 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4 % (26.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 % (20.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.6 % (23.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.4 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.4 % (21.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2 % (12.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 % (4.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 % (2.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7 % (26.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.4 % (4.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 17.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 % (19.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5 % (19.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.5 % (4.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved