VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > THE WASHINGTON HOME

THE WASHINGTON HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
THE WASHINGTON HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 1 % 
City Washington  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Washington
State attribute explanation DC   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have DC
Street 3720 UPTON STREET NW  
Zip Code 20016  
Phone 2029663720  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
192  (83.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
185  (93.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/6/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
185  (93.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.47  (0.3 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.49  (0.65 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.96  (0.37 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (5.34 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/17/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/10/2010
date Of Correction: 01/03/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 11/29/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 01/09/2012
date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 10/26/2010
date Of Correction: 10/26/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/12/2012
date Of Correction: 06/22/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 11/29/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/08/2010
date Of Correction: 03/29/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.1 % (13.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 % (29.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 % (12.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.4 % (2.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.5 % (2.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65.6 % (21.06 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.6 % (40.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.2 % (0.82 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3 % (3.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.6 % (9.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13 % (12.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8 % (6.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12 % (2.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 % (1.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.8 % (17.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9 % (9.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4 % (34.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 % (1.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.2 % (4.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.5 % (1.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 % (4.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved