Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| TIPTON OAK MANOR | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
49 (42.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.43 (0.34 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
| Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.84 (equals average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
| Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.27 (0.32 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
| Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.01 (5.48 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
| Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.01 (0.09 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 06/15/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Access To A Telephone For Resident To Use In Private. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 03/25/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Proof That All Residents' Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home, Is Secure. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 03/01/2010 date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/01/2010 date Of Correction: 03/10/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #7 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/15/2009 date Of Correction: 07/27/2009 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication | 18.2:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
6.8 % (26.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
9.3 % (7.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
12.9 (55.2) % (0.32 % higher than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
6.4 % (5.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6.4 % (21.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
86.4 % (1.76 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
82.6 % (1.34 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
20.7 (69.3) % (4.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4.5 % (19.2 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
13.6-28 % (0.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
8.7 % (0.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
53.2 % (9.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
1.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
7.4 % (12.46 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
7.8 % (16.96 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
87.3 % (5.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
88.7 % (13.95 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
5.7 % (11.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||