VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TOWERS NURSING HOME

TOWERS NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TOWERS NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SMITHVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SMITHVILLE
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 907  
Zip Code 78957  
Phone 5122374606  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
114  (5.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
96  (4.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/5/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/5/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
96  (4.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/07/2011
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/01/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/17/2010
date Of Correction: 12/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/17/2010
date Of Correction: 12/09/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 11/17/2010
date Of Correction: 12/09/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/01/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/01/2010
date Of Correction: 12/03/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/08/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 % (9.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.4 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7 % (2.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 % (10.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 % (7.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.4 % (40.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.7 (72.9) % (2.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90 % (5.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5 % (6.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.4 % (0.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.4 % (6.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 % (3.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9 % (17.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.5 % (32.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.3 % (5.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
20.2 (68.4) % (54.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.4 % (13.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved