TRANSCENDENT HEALTHCARE OF BOONVILLE LLC

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BOONVILLE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have BOONVILLE
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	725 S SECOND ST
Zip Code	47601
Phone	8128971375
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	88 (20.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (88)
Total Number of Residents	71 (20.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (71)
Percent of Occupied Beds	81 % (2.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (81) %
Health Survey Date	6/27/2011
Fire Survey Date	6/29/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	5 (53.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	7 (49.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	17 (9.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	71 (20.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.46 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.05 (0.21 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.52 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (5.46 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/19/2009 date Of Correction: 11/10/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 01/16/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 11/09/2010 date Of Correction: 12/09/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 01/16/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 01/16/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 01/16/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 08/19/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 12/17/2009 date Of Correction: 01/16/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 11/10/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 11/09/2010 date Of Correction: 12/09/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25 % (0.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.8 % (30.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.8 % (5.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.8 % (8.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	16.9-24 % (3.44 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.5 % (21.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20 % (5.02 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	92.9 % (8.26 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93.3 % (9.36 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2 (43.9 lower than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	9.7 % (5.82 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.8 % (4.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.7:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.8 % (0.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.2 % (0.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	32.5 % (10.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.1 / 8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	8.5 % (11.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.5 - 2.0 % (38.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.5 % (3.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.9 % (2.86 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.5 % (12.06 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.5 % (15.75 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %