VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TRI-COUNTY NURSING HOME

TRI-COUNTY NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TRI-COUNTY NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TRENTON   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TRENTON
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 7280 SW STATE RD 26  
Zip Code 32693  
Phone 3524631222  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
81  (27.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
73  (18.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 10  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
73  (18.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.01  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/20/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 01/18/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 09/28/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Outside Ventilation Via A Window Or Mechanical Ventilation, Or Both.
survey Date: 09/09/2010
date Of Correction: 10/18/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 10/07/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/07/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 10/07/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 04/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/20/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.5 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.4 % (4.57 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (12.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.4 % (0.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.5 % (21.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4 % (21.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 % (9.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (3.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.4 % (5.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8 % (3.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
47.5 % (4.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (16.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.4 % (3.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.3 % (24.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
26.2 % (8.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved