VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER - LAKEWOOD

TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER - LAKEWOOD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER - LAKEWOOD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City KANSAS CITY   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have KANSAS CITY
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 7900 LEE'S SUMMIT ROAD  
Zip Code 64139  
Phone 8164047000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
188  (79.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
169  (77.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/27/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
169  (77.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.91  (0.68 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/15/2009
date Of Correction: 03/10/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 07/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/15/2009
date Of Correction: 03/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.1 % (10.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.6 % (29.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29 % (15.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (10.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 % (27.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 % (43.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 5.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
26.9 % (57.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
23.1 % (60.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 % (9.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (9.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12 % (2.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.1 % (15.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (17.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.5 - 2.0 % (38.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
22.9 % (58.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
19.9 % (54.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved