TULARE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	TULARE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have TULARE
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	680 EAST MERRITT AVENUE
Zip Code	93274
Phone	5596868581
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	5 (2.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (5)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	97 (11.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (97)
Total Number of Residents	82 (9.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (82)
Percent of Occupied Beds	85 % (1.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (85) %
Health Survey Date	5/24/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/31/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7

Staff Information
Number of Residents	82 (9.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (0.6 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.44 (0.6 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.61 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/01/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 10/01/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/01/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 10/01/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.5-24 % (5.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.1 % (3.44 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	14.8 % (2.22 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	14.7:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6 % (9.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8 % (5.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.3 % (27.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	8.8 % (34.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	35.2 % (10.18 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.4 % (6.76 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	88.1 % (4.16 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21 % (4.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.3 % (5.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.4-2413.6-24 % (3.18 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.3 % (0.8 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	40.7 % (2.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.8 % (2.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4 % (5.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.7 % (18.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	10.2 % (28.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	42.1 % (17.34 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	95.9 % (14.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.8 % (15.05 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	21.1 % (3.76 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %