VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > V I P MANOR

V I P MANOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
V I P MANOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WOOD RIVER   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WOOD RIVER
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 393 EDWARDSVILLE ROAD  
Zip Code 62095  
Phone 6182594111  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
106  (2.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
101  (9.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/18/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
101  (9.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.11  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/19/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.
survey Date: 03/08/2010
date Of Correction: 03/29/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 02/16/2010
date Of Correction: 02/25/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/15/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/15/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/19/2011
date Of Correction: 06/03/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/19/2011
date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/19/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/15/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 04/06/2011
date Of Correction: 04/07/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.5-24 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (28.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.3 % (7.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9 % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 % (4.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.7 % (2.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.5 % (10.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (26.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.8 % (30.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40.7 % (43.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9 % (4.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 % (7.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2 % (4.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.2 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.5 % (3.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 % (16.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2) % (6.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.8 % (40.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
26.5 % (48.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.3 % (9.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved