VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > VILLAGES OF ST PETERS, THE

VILLAGES OF ST PETERS, THE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
VILLAGES OF ST PETERS, THE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAINT PETERS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT PETERS
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 5400 EXECUTIVE CENTRE PARKWAY  
Zip Code 63376  
Phone 6369227600  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
130  (21.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
116  (24.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/15/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
116  (24.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.08  (0.24 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.56  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/24/2011
date Of Correction: 03/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/16/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/20/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/20/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.
survey Date: 03/28/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/20/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 05/11/2012
date Of Correction: 06/06/2012 

Building Service Equipment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Heating And Ventilation Systems That Have Been Properly Installed According To The Manufacturer's Instructions.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/14/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7 % (8.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (3.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.7 % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.2 % (1.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.8 % (8.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72.6 % (11.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4 % (44.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7 % (10.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.4 % (6.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 % (3.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.50 % (7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (8.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.5 % (2.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.8 % (2.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.5 % (5.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.6 % (0.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.1:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved