VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WARE MEMORIAL CARE CENTER

WARE MEMORIAL CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WARE MEMORIAL CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City AMARILLO   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have AMARILLO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 400 W 14TH ST BLDG A  
Zip Code 79101  
Phone 8063730471  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
19  (89.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
737 % (653.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/27/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/02/2010
date Of Correction: 03/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.7 % (13.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.2 (68.4) % (3.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.8 % (19.26 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 % (11.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 % (6.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1 % (21.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 % (20.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7 % (8.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.4 % (12.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.1 % (11.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 % (7.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2 % (3.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.9 % (17.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.7 % (3.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.5 % (13.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
35.9 % (38.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.4 % (11.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved