VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WAY-FAIR NURSING & REHAB CENTER

WAY-FAIR NURSING & REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WAY-FAIR NURSING & REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FAIRFIELD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have FAIRFIELD
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 305 N.W. 11TH STREET  
Zip Code 62837  
Phone 6188478284  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
104  (4.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
80  (11.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/29/2011  
Sprinkler Status Not Sprinklered  vs 1.1% Nursing Homes USA have Not Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
78  (13.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.57  (0.27 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06  (0.53 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/22/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 06/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 06/21/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/22/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 03/22/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/22/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/21/2011
date Of Correction: 07/07/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7 % (27.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (5.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.8 % (18.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (13.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 % (2.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3 % (24.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 % (40.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5 % (10.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.8 % (11.86 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10 % (15.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2 % (10.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.6 % (23.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (8.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.8 % (0.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9 % (15.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.4 % (35.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (18.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.2 % (14.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.8 % (22.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.1 % (2.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved