WEDGEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LAKELAND	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LAKELAND
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1010 CARPENTERS WAY
Zip Code	33809
Phone	8638150488
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	110 (18.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (110)
Percent of Occupied Beds	92 % (8.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (92) %
Health Survey Date	10/7/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/5/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	16

Staff Information
Number of Residents	110 (18.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.74 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.86 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.59 (equals average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.23 (5.26 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.23 (0.13 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/07/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/13/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/13/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/13/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 08/17/2011 date Of Correction: 08/31/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 08/17/2011 date Of Correction: 08/31/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 05/22/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 05/22/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 05/22/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 03/09/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.5 % (8.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.4 % (4.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5 % (10.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.50 % (11.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.50 % (26.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	7.4 % (36.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27 % (1.98 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (15.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (16.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.7 % (7.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.9 % (21.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.2 % (2.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	30.9 % (12.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.2 % (5.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.6 % (5.98 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.6 % (18.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.1 % (33.43 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.6 % (2.16 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	99.8 % (18.36 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (25.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	22.5 % (5.16 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %