VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WESLACO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

WESLACO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WESLACO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WESLACO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WESLACO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 422 E 18TH ST  
Zip Code 78596  
Phone 9569738451  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
115  (6.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
99 % (15.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/4/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/3/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.02  (0.57 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 10/08/2009
date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/08/2009
date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/10/2011
date Of Correction: 05/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/12/2011
date Of Correction: 02/09/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/15/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 08/17/2010
date Of Correction: 09/10/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/15/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 05/15/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 04/08/2009
date Of Correction: 04/30/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 01/12/2011
date Of Correction: 02/09/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.1 % (7.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 % (5.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.5 % (1.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 % (2.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.9 % (2.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (10.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.9 % (1.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
34.5 % (50.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
27.3 % (56.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (12.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34 % (8.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 % (7.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 % (0.58 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (1.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.7 % (9.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 % (1.72 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.8 % (36.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 % (23.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
29.2 % (52.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.7 % (50.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved