Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING AT STAPELEY | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
114 (22.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.58 (0.19 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.63 (0.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.21 (0.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (5.39 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (equals average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 10/31/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/06/2009 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/13/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/09/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Employ Or Obtain Outside Professional Resources Providing Services In The Nursing Home That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 08/02/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/03/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
2 % (30.95 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
15.7 % (0.96 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
18 % (5.42 % higher than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
17 % (5.17 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
64.1 % (19.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
7 % (6.46 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
34.7 % (49.94 % lower than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
15.4 % (68.54 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
24 % (1.39 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
14.4 % (0.3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers | 13.1:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
19.9 % (11.4 % higher than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
63.3 % (19.92 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1 % (9.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
14.9-28 % (9.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
33.3 % (48.14 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
14.5 % (60.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
24.8 % (7.46 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|