VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING AT STAPELEY

WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING AT STAPELEY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING AT STAPELEY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Philadelphia  vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have Philadelphia
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 6300 GREENE STREET  
Zip Code 19144  
Phone 2158440700  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.58  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 09/23/2011
date Of Correction: 10/31/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 10/01/2009
date Of Correction: 11/06/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/30/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.
survey Date: 10/01/2009
date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Employ Or Obtain Outside Professional Resources Providing Services In The Nursing Home That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/30/2010
date Of Correction: 08/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/01/2009
date Of Correction: 11/03/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (30.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7 % (0.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
18 % (5.42 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17 % (5.17 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.1 % (19.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7 % (6.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
34.7 % (49.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
15.4 % (68.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 % (1.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.4 % (0.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
19.9 % (11.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.3 % (19.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (9.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.9-28 % (9.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
33.3 % (48.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
14.5 % (60.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.8 % (7.46 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved