WESTCHESTER GARDENS REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	CLEARWATER	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have CLEARWATER
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	3301 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Zip Code	33761
Phone	7277858335
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	105 (13.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (105)
Percent of Occupied Beds	88 % (4.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (88) %
Health Survey Date	5/27/2011
Fire Survey Date	5/27/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6

Staff Information
Number of Residents	105 (13.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.87 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.08 (0.24 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.95 (0.36 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (5.32 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/14/2011 date Of Correction: 04/14/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 03/14/2011 date Of Correction: 04/14/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 03/14/2011 date Of Correction: 04/14/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/25/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	13 % (12.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.50 % (31.45 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	1.6 % (10.98 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.9 % (0.07 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9 % (4.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.3 % (24.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.3 % (39.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.2:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.5 % (8.86 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	95 % (11.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	11.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.3 % (8.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	10.7:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	55.9 % (12.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.6 % (9.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	15.6 % (6.02 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.8 % (16.06 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	7.2 % (31.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.9 % (7.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.4 % (1.64 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.9 % (10.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93.9 % (19.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13 % (4.34 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %