VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CENTER

WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City WHITE SULPHUR SPRING   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WHITE SULPHUR SPRING
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street ROUTE 92, PO BOX 249  
Zip Code 24986  
Phone 3045364661  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
68  (40.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
61  (30.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/19/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
61  (30.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.95  (0.18 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.47  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.42  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/26/2010
date Of Correction: 06/08/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Private Space Is Available In The Nursing Home For Resident Groups Or Residents' Families To Meet.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/22/2011
date Of Correction: 08/16/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Provide 3 Meals At Regular Times; 2) Serve Breakfast Within 14 Hours After Dinner; Or 3) Offer A Snack At Bedtime Each Day.
survey Date: 09/16/2011
date Of Correction: 10/19/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (31.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 % (0.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.8 % (41.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.1 % (8.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3 % (9.66 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.9 % (0.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4 % (43.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4 % (10.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.4 % (4.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7 % (20 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2 % (5.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16 % (6.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2 % (1.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.9 % (14.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.5 % (5.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (6.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.3 % (9.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.1 % (7.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.7 % (4.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
40.5 % (23.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved