VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WHITNEY OAKS CARE CENTER

WHITNEY OAKS CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WHITNEY OAKS CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CARMICHAEL   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have CARMICHAEL
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 3529 WALNUT AVENUE  
Zip Code 95608  
Phone 9164888601  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
126  (17.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
103  (11.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
82 % (1.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 10  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
103  (11.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.73  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.
survey Date: 07/24/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.2 % (16.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9 % (13.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 % (3.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 % (10.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 % (6.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.5 % (3.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8 % (2.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.7 % (4.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.2 % (15.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (8.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8 % (1.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.1 % (0.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.3 % (4.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.6 % (9.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.1 % (1.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
69.7 % (5.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 % (8.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved