VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WILLIAM CLOUGH ECU

WILLIAM CLOUGH ECU

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WILLIAM CLOUGH ECU VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NEW LONDON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NEW LONDON
State attribute explanation NH   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH
Street 273 COUNTY ROAD  
Zip Code 3257  
Phone 6035265312  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
56  (52.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
55  (36.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
16  (8.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
55  (36.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.58  (0.26 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 11/24/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.
survey Date: 03/18/2010
date Of Correction: 05/02/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.4 % (4.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 % (29.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7 % (10.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1 % (26.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (16.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.2 % (1.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.3 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 % (11.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.2 % (6.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (20.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (7.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.1 % (8.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 % (3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51 % (7.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 % (4.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.5 % (6.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.7 % (8.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80 % (5.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved