VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WILLIAMSBURG VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CAMPUS

WILLIAMSBURG VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CAMPUS

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WILLIAMSBURG VILLAGE HEALTHCARE CAMPUS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DESOTO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have DESOTO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 941 SCOTLAND DR  
Zip Code 75115  
Phone 9725726200  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
242  (133.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
230  (138.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/25/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
34  (26.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
230  (138.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.41 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.66  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.
survey Date: 08/12/2011
date Of Correction: 09/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/21/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/02/2009
date Of Correction: 04/27/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 09/09/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/06/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/06/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/29/2009 

Deficiency #11 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/29/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/31/2011
date Of Correction: 04/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies And Procedures For Influenza And Pneumococcal Immunizations.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Employ Qualified Full-time, Part-time Or Consultant Professionals That Must Be Licensed, Certified, Or Registered Staff To Give Needed Services.
survey Date: 06/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/06/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 03/10/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/21/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 06/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.1 % (11.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9 % (15.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.2 % (7.66 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (13.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.5 % (3.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.1 % (5.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.6 % (9.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2 % (10.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.9 % (8.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.9 % (2.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.2 % (1.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 21.2:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved