VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR

WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WILLOWS OF PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OAKMONT   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OAKMONT
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 1215 HULTON ROAD  
Zip Code 15139  
Phone 4128285600  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
202-639-1800  (93.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
187  (95.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/7/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
187  (95.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.61  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (5.34 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/20/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/28/2009
date Of Correction: 10/20/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 11/07/2011
date Of Correction: 12/22/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/07/2012
date Of Correction: 07/05/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 05/07/2012
date Of Correction: 07/05/2012 

Fire Alarm Systems Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: A Fire Alarm System That Can Be Heard Throughout The Facility.
survey Date: 03/31/2011
date Of Correction: 05/31/2011 

Miscellaneous Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Other Fire Safety Features Required By Fire Safety Codes.
survey Date: 03/31/2011
date Of Correction: 05/31/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9 % (4.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 % (31.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.4 % (9.74 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 % (0.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.2 % (13.66 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 % (2.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (26.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (40.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.8 % (9.78 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.2 % (0.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.3 % (2.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.1 % (13 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 % (3.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.7 % (17.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.3 % (0.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (17.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.8 % (32.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
43.3 % (38.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.3 % (3.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved