VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WINDSOR CARE CENTER OF PETALUMA

WINDSOR CARE CENTER OF PETALUMA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WINDSOR CARE CENTER OF PETALUMA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PETALUMA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PETALUMA
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 523 HAYES LANE  
Zip Code 94952  
Phone 7077632457  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
79  (29.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
60  (31.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
76 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/7/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/18/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
60  (31.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide At Least One Room Set Aside To Use As A Resident Dining Room And For Activities, That Is A Good Size, With Good Lighting, Air Flow And Furniture.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: 02/03/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/05/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge.
survey Date: 02/18/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 03/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/28/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/22/2009
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42.6 % (17.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.7 % (11.04 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1 % (7.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (13.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2 % (11.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.8 % (20.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.3 % (16.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
23.1 % (61.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
28.8 % (55.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
41.2 % (15.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (4.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2 % (7.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 % (2.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.8 % (5.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9 % (7.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 % (15.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.4 % (13.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
34 % (47.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
50.8 % (23.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 % (1.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved