VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WINDSOR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF OAKLAND

WINDSOR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF OAKLAND

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WINDSOR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF OAKLAND VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OAKLAND   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have OAKLAND
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 2919 FRUITVALE AVE  
Zip Code 94602  
Phone 5102618564  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
94  (14.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
82  (9.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
82  (9.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.15  (0.44 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/01/2010
date Of Correction: 02/10/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 01/30/2012
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 01/30/2012
date Of Correction: 02/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 01/24/2012
date Of Correction: 02/17/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/28/2012
date Of Correction: 04/04/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/28/2012
date Of Correction: 04/04/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/13/2012
date Of Correction: 04/05/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.6 % (0.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12 % (0.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 % (10.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3 % (16.72 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.4 % (5.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.2 % (7.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.6 % (2.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 % (9.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8 % (1.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (37.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 % (6.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.8 % (5.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.7 % (12.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.5 % (11.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved