VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WINDSOR HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD

WINDSOR HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WINDSOR HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GROESBECK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GROESBECK
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1025 W YEAGUA  
Zip Code 76642  
Phone 2547293366  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
82  (26.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
48  (43.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
48  (43.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28  (0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/27/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/27/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 03/30/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/27/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/23/2012
date Of Correction: 02/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 04/02/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/27/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/23/2012
date Of Correction: 02/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 03/30/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40 % (14.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.7 % (3.04 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.4 % (5.57 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.5 % (6.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17 % (11.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10.6 % (33.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.5 % (15.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.4 % (0.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.2 % (3.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.2 % (37.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.2 % (7.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9.3 % (29.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.5 % (1.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
64 % (17.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.7 % (13.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.9 % (10.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved