VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WINDSOR PLACE

WINDSOR PLACE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WINDSOR PLACE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DAINGERFIELD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have DAINGERFIELD
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 507 E WATSON BLVD  
Zip Code 75638  
Phone 9036453915  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
106  (2.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
64  (27.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
60 % (23.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(3.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
62  (29.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05  (0.21 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 06/20/2012
date Of Correction: 07/30/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/23/2012
date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 03/23/2012
date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 03/23/2012
date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.9 % (3.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14 % (1.42 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.8 % (1.97 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.2 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.9 % (36.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2 % (10.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.9 % (10.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.8 % (5.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.3 % (2.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6 % (0.02 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.7 % (31.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (5.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.8 % (26.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40 % (34.75 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved