VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WINFIELD REST HAVEN II, LLC

WINFIELD REST HAVEN II, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WINFIELD REST HAVEN II, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WINFIELD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WINFIELD
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 1611  
Zip Code 67156  
Phone 6202219290  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
45  (63.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
39  (52.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/3/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/3/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
39  (52.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.47  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies And Procedures For Influenza And Pneumococcal Immunizations.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 18.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4 % (27.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1 % (5.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.2 % (1.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 % (6.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.2 % (6.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 % (19.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (4.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.7 % (5.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (17.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.9 % (1.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.1 % (33.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 12.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.1 % (13.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved