VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WITTENBERG LUTHERAN VILLAGE

WITTENBERG LUTHERAN VILLAGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WITTENBERG LUTHERAN VILLAGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CROWN POINT   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CROWN POINT
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1200 E LUTHER DR  
Zip Code 46307  
Phone 2196633860  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
155  (46.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
148  (56.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/19/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
148  (56.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.79  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/12/2011
date Of Correction: 06/03/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/24/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/26/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/26/2011
date Of Correction: 08/10/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/12/2011
date Of Correction: 06/03/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/24/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/24/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.4 % (1.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.7 % (3.87 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 % (12.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 % (14.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 % (8.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (26.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (42.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9 % (13.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.6 % (0.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.4 % (9.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (14.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.3 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 % (22.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9 % (10.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.4 % (7.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.6 % (14.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (7.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2 % (18.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13 % (11.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.2 % (1.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.2 % (14.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 19.1:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved