VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WOLCOTT HALL NURSING CTR

WOLCOTT HALL NURSING CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WOLCOTT HALL NURSING CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Torrington  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have Torrington
State attribute explanation CT   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT
Street 215 FOREST ST  
Zip Code 6790  
Phone 8604828554  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
87  (21.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
66  (25.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
76 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/20/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 20  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
66  (25.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.65  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/16/2009
date Of Correction: 01/27/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/16/2009
date Of Correction: 01/27/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/16/2009
date Of Correction: 01/27/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 06/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/03/2010
date Of Correction: 07/15/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 02/22/2012
date Of Correction: 03/15/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (3.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4 % (29.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 % (12.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 % (9.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 % (3.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (13.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 % (8.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13 % (15.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31 % (5.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83 % (0.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9 % (4.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9 % (10.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1 % (4.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.9 % (13.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (8.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 19.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.7 % (3.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved