VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WOODLAND CARE CENTER

WOODLAND CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WOODLAND CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City RESEDA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have RESEDA
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 7120 CORBIN AVE.  
Zip Code 91335  
Phone 8188814540  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
157  (48.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
137  (45.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/29/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 10  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
137  (45.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.52  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (5.31 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/15/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 % (9.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.8 % (1.22 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 % (6.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 % (10.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 % (42.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.5 % (7.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81 % (2.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9 % (1.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (8.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.2 % (4.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
79.7 % (36.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6 % (7.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8 % (9.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.3 % (2.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80 % (1.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83 % (8.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 


Scroll To Top

saved