WOODLAND PARK REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SALT LAKE CITY	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SALT LAKE CITY
State attribute explanation	UT	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT	compare UT Nursing Homes USA
Street	3855 SOUTH 700 EAST
Zip Code	84106
Phone	8012684766
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (5)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	184 (75.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (184)
Total Number of Residents	140 (48.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (140)
Percent of Occupied Beds	76 % (7.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (76) %
Health Survey Date	11/4/2010
Fire Survey Date	11/2/2010
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	13 (5.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	140 (48.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.39 (1.62 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.39 (0.45 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.78 (1.19 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (5.41 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/14/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For. survey Date: 09/28/2011 date Of Correction: 10/13/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 06/25/2009 date Of Correction: 08/10/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 11/04/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 01/14/2010 date Of Correction: 03/01/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/25/2009 date Of Correction: 08/10/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20.6 % (4.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38.1 % (21.44 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.2 % (2.38 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.8 % (4.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	34.1 % (10.44 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.7 % (6.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.7 % (4.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	39.3 % (10.92 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.7 % (39.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	56.7 % (31.68 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	98.5 % (13.86 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	97.7 % (13.76 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (12.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.1 % (10.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38 % (23.9 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.58 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.5 % (2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	37.8 % (5.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.6 % (3.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.8 % (0.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	30 % (10.14 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.5 % (36.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	50.7 % (25.94 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.6 % (16.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.5 % (23.75 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	17.1:1 %