VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WOODLANDS AT RIVER TERRACE ESTATES

WOODLANDS AT RIVER TERRACE ESTATES

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WOODLANDS AT RIVER TERRACE ESTATES VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BLUFFTON   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BLUFFTON
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 400 CAYLOR BLVD  
Zip Code 46714  
Phone 2608248940  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
30  (78.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
30  (61.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/26/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/26/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(2.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
30  (61.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/09/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 06/29/2009
date Of Correction: 07/15/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/09/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/09/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/09/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 % (29.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 % (20.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4 % (11.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.4 % (12.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20 % (5.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4-2413.6-24 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.2 % (3.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.6-28 % (5.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (0.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.50 % (18.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 % (7.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (20.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 % (16.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 % (22.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved