VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WOODVIEW, THE

WOODVIEW, THE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WOODVIEW, THE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SOUTH BOSTON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SOUTH BOSTON
State attribute explanation VA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have VA
Street 103 ROSEHILL DRIVE  
Zip Code 24592  
Phone 4345724906  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
180  (71.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
165  (73.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
92 % (8.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/20/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
19  (11.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
165  (73.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 07/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.6 % (10.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (31.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.8 % (2.14 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2 % (2.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.9 % (8.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (13.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15 % (1.54 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.8 % (14.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (3.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.1 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72.3 % (11.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.7 % (43.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5 % (11.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14 % (11.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (1.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.3 % (2.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.7 % (2.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.7 % (1.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 % (2.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.8 % (3.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 


Scroll To Top

saved