VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > WORTHINGTON MANOR, INC.

WORTHINGTON MANOR, INC.

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
WORTHINGTON MANOR, INC. VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PARKERSBURG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PARKERSBURG
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street 2675 36TH STREET  
Zip Code 26104  
Phone 3044857447  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
105  (3.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
101  (9.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/11/2010  
Fire Survey Date 3/18/2010  
Sprinkler Status Missing/no Data  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Missing/No Data
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
101  (9.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/31/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/31/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/31/2010
date Of Correction: 04/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/31/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/31/2010
date Of Correction: 11/09/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/02/2011
date Of Correction: 07/30/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (10.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.6-28 % (11.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.1 % (19.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2 % (1.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.5 % (3.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.4 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (37.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19 % (5.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
29.5 % (51.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.3 % (23.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.4 % (1.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved