YUBA SKILLED NURSING CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	YUBA CITY	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have YUBA CITY
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	521 LOREL WAY
Zip Code	95991
Phone	5306749140
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	130 (21.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (130)
Total Number of Residents	94 (2.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (94)
Percent of Occupied Beds	72 % (11.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (72) %
Health Survey Date	1/12/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/18/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6

Staff Information
Number of Residents	94 (2.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.76 (0.01 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.48 (0.36 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.24 (0.35 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (5.32 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/10/2011 date Of Correction: 04/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/01/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/23/2012 date Of Correction: 05/29/2012

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 06/01/2012 date Of Correction: 07/03/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/01/2012 date Of Correction: 04/19/2012

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/01/2012 date Of Correction: 04/19/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20 % (5.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.2 % (10.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	10.8 % (1.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	36.7 % (7.84 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6 % (7.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.9 % (23.48 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.3 % (4.72 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.7 % (9.06 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.5 % (7.56 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.4 % (13.12 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.4 % (9.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.6 % (6.5 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	35.2 % (8.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.9 % (4.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.9 % (13.96 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.1 % (5.63 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.9 % (5.86 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.6 % (10.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	84.8 % (10.05 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	7.6 % (9.74 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %