Back

NURSING CARE AT HARTSFIELD VILLAGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NURSING CARE AT HARTSFIELD VILLAGE VS
Nursing Homes USA
General
City MUNSTER   0% Nursing Homes USA have MUNSTER
State attribute explanation IN   3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 503 OTIS R BOWEN DR  
Zip Code 46321  
Phone 2199340590  
Overall Star Rating
4 
3.11
Health Inspections Star Rating
3 
2.83
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4 
3.17
Quality Measures Star Rating
2 
3.31
RN Only Star Rating
3 
3.17
Number of Certified Beds
106 
108.94
Total Number of Residents
101 
91.25
Percent of Occupied Beds
95 %
83.65 %
Health Survey Date 4/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/25/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Other  1.9% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Other
Located Within a Hospital? No  93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2 
58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2 
56.31
# of deficiencies
3 
7.48
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101 
91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6 
0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.29 
0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.89 
1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09 
5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09 
0.10
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/15/2009
date Of Correction: 01/07/2010 
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 12/15/2009
date Of Correction: 01/07/2010 
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 %
25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7 %
32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 18.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3 %
12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 %
11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 %
15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.6 %
28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 %
43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 %
25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.9 %
84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.7 %
83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 %
45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 %
15.52 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 %
25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2 %
23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.1 %
14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 %
9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.4-2413.6-24 %
8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.5 %
43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 %
10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5 %
9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.2 %
38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 %
10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.1 %
24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.1 %
81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.5 %
74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 %
17.34 %

Mobile - Classic
saved